This is an old article, one we have all most likely read in the recent past.
I just found it on webmd.
I find it interesting that they quote only a Supplier as an advocate of the e-cig, and then go on to quote a profesional in the health field as an opponent. I wonder why they didn't at least speak to a professional who is also pro e-cig Like Dr. Michael Siegel for instance, if anything, just so the statements are with equal merit.
Quote:
Device makers say they make no health claims for their products. Craig Youngblood, president of the InLife e-cigarette company, says that since regular tobacco is very bad for you, something that assuages your nicotine habit without smoke must be less bad.
"In our product you have nicotine or no nicotine, PEG, and some flavoring. In cigarettes you have nicotine, PEG, and 4,000 chemicals and 43 carcinogens," Youngblood last April told WebMD. "I am a proponent of harm reduction. People have rights and choices and should be allowed to make them."
Others see the devices as a sneaky way to get people hooked on nicotine. One is Michael Eriksen, ScD, director of the institute of public health at Atlanta's Georgia State University and former director of CDC's office of smoking and health.
"I have seen no evidence that people switch from tobacco cigarettes to e-cigarettes or other smokeless tobacco products," Eriksen recently told WebMD. "If you look at how smokeless products are marketed, they are sold as something to use at times you can't smoke. The implication is you will increase nicotine exposure, not reduce smoking."
|
Could it be because webmd is covered with advertisments for pharmaceuticals, including Chantix?