Hmmm...
The PACT ACT 2009 was passed by Congress and signed by the President. Any amendment to it would have to go through that same process. I suppose that is possible, but I am not concerned that the ACT will be amended to cover PVs.
To me the continuing FDA battle is much more threatening. Additionally, I find it highly suspect that the state bills in NY, MD, IL and CA all have very similar language that bans electronic cigarettes. Fortunately the MD bill died in committee although I think they still have another one that would prohibit indoor vaping. CA's bill is being amended to only prohibit sales to minors -- which is fine with me. Not sure of the status of NY's bill. IL's bill, already passed in the IL Senate, was read in the House Health Committee yesterday and fortunately many of our Illinois vapers attended to voice their disapproval. The House committee recessed until next week to gather more facts. So next week is the next big battle to keep our rights. Go Illinois vapers!!
It is my gut feeling that Big Pharma is behind these state bills and tried to pull a fast one to protect their useless NRT products and profits. While they do have the money and the influence, I think it will be very difficult to do this on a national scale via the legislature (hence getting that amendment will not be easy). But Big Pharma is using the FDA to protect their interests on a national scale and with the FDA's policy of expanding their fiefdom without limits, it's a serious concern.